Certainly there are events that most people aren't that interested in, but I figure that's what a DVR is for. If you think the Olympics are boring, it probably is unless you can watch exactly what you're interested in watching. This Olympics we watched a lot of biathlon, cross-country skiing, speed skating, and hockey. Those were the sports that we focused on. When I take a step back and look at what these sports have in common, all but hockey are races and all are events where competitors compete directly against each other. Forget judges, forget individual "tricks", and definitely forget any event where the competitors are teenage punks that listen to their iPods while competing. I just can't reconcile the spirit of the Olympics and the idea of pure competition with those events. Seriously, save that for the X Games and save your headphones for a more appropriate time.
Overall, I was entertained by this Olympics. Canada set a new record with the most gold medals (14) won in a Winter Olympics after narrowly beating the USA in a thrilling OT gold medal hockey game. For the first time ever, the United States won the medal count (37) in a Winter Olympics and also set a new record for the most medals ever won (37) in a single Winter Olympic Games by one country. However, Norway still leads in the all time medal and gold medal count by 53 medals and 16 golds over the USA and the Soviet Union, respectively. Not bad for my "homeland" considering their population is about 5 million people.
This brings me to my next point - who really won these Olympics? Canada or the USA? Believe it or not, many other countries (including the IOC from what I hear) consider whoever won the most gold medals to be the winner. England (and it seems Europe) is one country that thinks the most gold medals win, while Canada and the USA consider the most medals as the winner. When you think through this for only a few minutes, both are probably too simplistic. Neither make perfect sense. For example:
Example 1
Country 1 = 10 Golds, 0 Silver, 0 Bronze
Country 2 = 9 Golds, 10 Silvers ,15 Bronzes
Those who subscribe to the "Gold Theory" would say that Country 1 won the Olympic medal race. Obviously, that doesn't make much logical sense.
Example 2
Country 1 = 15 Golds, 4 Silvers, 1 Bronze
Country 2 = 0 Golds, 0 Silvers, 21 Bronzes
Those who subscribe to the "Overall Medal Count Theory" would say that Country 2 won the Olympic Medal race. Obviously, that doesn't make much logical sense either.
The only way you can really determine who had the best Olympics is to assign a point value to each medal and calculate a score. The winner of the Olympics would be the country with the most points. The point value is debatable, but I think each medal should count for double its next lesser medal. That is, 1 point for a Bronze, 2 points for a Silver, and 4 points for a Gold. The only other scoring system I might use is a 1, 2, 3 - but I think the Gold is more important and since I'm using this example to show how the USA won this Olympics, I wanted to weight Golds won by Canada (since they won the most) by the higher number. So, using the "Aaron scale" (4-2-1), the results of the 2010 Vancouver Olympics are:
1st - USA - 79
2nd - Canada - 75
3rd - Germany - 73
4th - Norway - 58
5th - South Korea - 38
USA! USA! USA! Surprising, really. We have long been a Summer Olympics powerhouse but it looks like we might be making strides in the Winter Olympics too. Cue Lee Greenwood's song now.










